The Diocesan Dialogue
Current Issue
July 2007

Park City Priest Participates in Reconcilers' Seminar

By Pat McCaughan, May 24, 2007

Rev. Charles Robinson [ENS, Los Angeles] Gifted peacemakers and creative solutions won't resolve the conflicts in the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion; changing hearts and church culture will, the Rev. Brian Cox told prospective reconcilers at St. James Church in Los Angeles on Wednesday.

"Our purpose is not to solve the conflict in the Episcopal Church but rather to promote a culture of reconciliation in the life of the church, a paradigm shift away from win-lose advocacy to faith-based reconciliation," said Cox, rector of Christ the King Church in Santa Barbara, California.

About 65 lay and clergy Episcopalians from across the nation are attending "A Third Way," a faith-based reconciliation training seminar being held through May 25 at St. James Church in the Wilshire district of Los Angeles.

"There are two current cultures, militant movements, driving the conflict in the church, militant progressivism and militant orthodoxy," said Cox.

"This is about creating a third way, a positive way, a proactive way, in the life of the Episcopal Church. It also offers people hope. Our experience has been that the whole seriousness of the conflict hasn't changed but people come away with a feeling of hope."

After 17 years of "watching churches behaving badly" including a split among his own congregation, St. Luke's in Park City, Utah, the Rev. Charles Robinson said he decided to attend the reconcilers seminar because: "I believe that, if people are offered a model of health, they'll take it."

"One of my first positions was in a Baptist church in East Texas that split right down the middle—it was a Hatfields and McCoys kind of thing—it wasn't over theology. It was over who's going to be in control, who's going to set the agenda and I've watched this happen, over and over and over again," he said.

With St. Luke's on the rebound, he is proactive. "Right now, the Communion's fighting about sexuality, but that's a red herring. The issue is how do you deal with differences and how do you do it in some way other than taking sides and demonizing people who don't agree with you if you're going to have any kind of witness to the world? Why would anyone want to join a church like that?"

Return to current issue Table of Contents
Return to Dialogue main page »